rss feed

The Body

crystalmeth.org



hivcruise.com

February 7th, 2011

The Hilarious Idiocy of Anonymous Gay Sex

The cute robots in this video are about to get down ‘n nasty after hooking up through a gay chat site. There’s just one problem: the horned up bareback bottom forgot to ask the top about his HIV status. What follows is a funny, pornographic (NSFW), painfully realistic “negotiation” in which stupidity rules the day.

I have had conversations exactly like this one. And I’ll go even further: in my crystal meth days, I had chats like these through glory holes. “If you’re clean, we’ll do it raw,” the gentleman in the adjoining booth would suggest, to which I would reply, “You’re going to take the word of a stranger you’re talking to through a three inch hole in the wall…?”

Robot DDFThe joke, if there really is one, is on the bareback bottoms who “restrict” their hookups to men who claim they are negative. These misguided folks are almost certainly already positive and don’t yet know it, leaving the door open for them to infect others.

The lesson in all this, of course, is not to put your life into the hands of someone you’ve known for five minutes. Or five months. The responsibility not to get exposed to HIV (and hepatitis and other STD’s) is entirely yours. And another thing: if you’re a sexually active “man about town” and your last HIV test was months ago, the results don’t really matter anymore. Go get a new one.

I exchanged e-mails with the producer of the robot video, who prefers the anonymity of cyberspace but nevertheless has strong feelings about the curious mating habits of the gay male. “If (HIV negative) guys are out there having anonymous sex with strangers, they’re having plenty of contact with HIV+ guys.” he wrote me. “Is there really something that they’d do with a stranger from Manhunt or Grindr that they wouldn’t do with someone who says he’s HIV+? It seems that what bothers them is knowing the truth.”

“I’d like to think that gay men could educate themselves enough to apply a safety standard to their conduct that doesn’t stigmatize anybody,” he goes on, perhaps a bit optimistically, “rather than hide behind a curtain of fear and blame.

GloryHoleI explored a lot of this territory is one of my older videos, “Mark’s R-Rated Sex Pig Blog.” In the video I discuss risks like barebacking and reenact my glory hole conversations (left), complete with a wall, a hole, and my friend Brian playing “the mouth.” And since the video was done before I got a handle on my meth addiction, you can see the ravages of addiction on my face, which is a lesson all its own.

This funny, bawdy robot video says more about the state of gay male sexual risk than any of the horrid public health campaigns out there today. It is exactly the kind of message I would have praised in my recent video conversation with HIV activist Sean Strub about HIV prevention campaigns.

If you want to do something about new HIV infections among our gay brothers, here’s an easy task: send this video to every sexually active guy you know.

Sometimes the truth hurts. In this case, it’s also hilarious.

————————————————————–
Kudos to Maureen McCarty of The New Gay for flagging this video for me. Finding potty-mouthed robots chatting about risky sex is exactly what makes a good editor, I always say. — Mark

Tags: , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “The Hilarious Idiocy of Anonymous Gay Sex”

  1. Sean McShee Says:

    February 7th, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    Great video. No one takes at face value the age, weight, or penis size in an on-line profile and these can be readily disconfirmed. Yet people will believe reports of HIV status which cannot be disconfirmed.

    I have never found a pro-disclosure message that emphasizes that you should be asking when you last tested negative. In the 70s the standard was to test for STDs every 3 months. I have not seen any public health messaging giving a similar standard for std tests (for either positives or negatives). These are simple messages that should be promoted.

    finally, the strategy employed in the video is actually less effective that that of the het porn industry – test and segregate. Yet there has been no alignment of criticism of the het porn industry with criticisms of mindless serosorting.

  2. Paul Says:

    February 9th, 2011 at 5:38 pm

    LOVE THIS. I’ll never forget how I came to the realization… I was telling my mom the guy I was dating was HIV+. She was concerned for my health, but I told her, at least I know – i’m not making assumptions and doing the stupid shit I did before. She and I realized at the same time I was right.

    Three years later, I’m negative, whereas a lot of my friends… haven’t been so lucky in that time.

  3. Sue Says:

    February 12th, 2011 at 12:32 pm

    Too true.

  4. Gary S Says:

    February 22nd, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    Paul hit the nail on the head!

  5. J. Says:

    December 11th, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    I agree Mark, this is why no matter who I am with I assume that they are HIV+ or have other STDs and I have safer sex with them.

    I’ve met way too many men who get into barebacking and assume that it’s perfectly fine to do it raw and they’ll say the same old excuses of “Tops don’t get HIV”, or “I may do it raw but I know the men who I’m hooking up with are being truthful when they tell me they’re neg!”

    I’m in my late 20s and it is very disturbing how a lot of adult men who are younger than I am seem to think that it’s perfectly fine to do it raw/bare. It’s not just men who are like this but it’s women too. Then again this is one major reason why I haven’t been active in awhile.

    HIV meds do work but they’re not foolproof and just because someone has a low or undetectable viral load someone can still be infected or even reinfected with HIV, or with other strains of HIV which is something people who do it raw seem to ignore.

  6. elemenoh Says:

    April 3rd, 2012 at 9:43 pm

    I was having a conversation with some guys online about how we find the word “clean” offensive. This video hit the nail on the head. Sadly, the kind of conversation the robots have here takes place way too infrequently.

Leave a Reply



  • « Older Entries
  • Newer Entries »